Foot and Leg Crushing from Equipment Running Over Operator
HighThe most serious and common hazard in pedestrian-operated forklift operation is operators' feet or legs being crushed under equipment wheels or load wheels. This occurs when operators lose control of equipment on slopes or ramps where gravity accelerates equipment faster than operators can safely walk, when equipment unexpectedly rolls due to brake system failures or failure to engage park brakes during stationary operations, when operators attempt to step aside from moving equipment paths but misjudge equipment movement or stumble whilst moving, or when operators position feet too close to equipment whilst manoeuvring in confined spaces and equipment wheels contact feet. The weight of pedestrian-operated equipment typically ranges from 500kg to 2000kg depending on model and battery weight, concentrating crushing force through small equipment wheel contact areas creating tremendous pressure on feet or legs contacted. Battery weight positioned low in equipment provides stability but significantly increases total equipment mass. Slopes and ramps present particular risk as equipment can gain momentum if operators lose grip on tiller handles or attempt to control descents without proper braking, with loaded equipment having significantly greater momentum than unladen machines. Wet or contaminated floor surfaces reduce equipment traction and increase likelihood of equipment sliding or skidding beyond operator control. Operator fatigue from extended shifts walking behind equipment reduces reaction times and stability, increasing stumble and contact risks.
Consequence: Severe crushing injuries to feet including fractured bones, crushed metatarsals requiring surgical reconstruction, soft tissue damage, and potential requirement for toe or foot amputation if crushing damage is extensive. Extended time off work for treatment and rehabilitation, permanent disability affecting mobility and capacity for manual handling work, chronic pain, and psychological trauma from injury experience.
Crushing Between Equipment and Structures in Confined Spaces
HighOperating pedestrian-operated forklifts in warehouse aisles, loading areas, and confined spaces creates crushing risks when operators become trapped between moving equipment and fixed structures including racking, walls, columns, or parked vehicles. This hazard is acute during reversing operations when operators walk backwards whilst controlling equipment, unable to see obstacles behind them and relying on awareness of aisle layouts and mirror checks. Confined aisle operations with minimal clearances either side of equipment mean operators working alongside equipment have limited space to position themselves safely, particularly when loads extend beyond equipment width requiring operators to stand very close to racking or structures whilst manoeuvring. Misjudgement of available clearances when navigating tight spaces can result in operators realising too late that insufficient space exists between equipment and structures to accommodate both equipment and operator, becoming trapped as equipment continues moving. Equipment unexpected movement due to unintended tiller control activation or equipment rolling on slopes can push operators against structures before they can escape. Working in congested areas with multiple pedestrians, other equipment, or temporary obstacles reduces available maneuvering space and creates distraction preventing operators maintaining full awareness of positioning relative to surrounding structures. High-visibility clothing worn by operators provides limited protection if operators are squeezed between equipment and structures as crushing forces are independent of visibility.
Consequence: Severe crushing injuries to torso, pelvis, or legs causing internal injuries, fractured pelvis or ribs, spinal damage, and potential fatalities depending on crushing forces applied and duration of entrapment. Medical shock and organ damage requiring emergency treatment. Permanent disability from spinal injuries affecting quality of life long-term. Psychological trauma requiring counseling and potential inability to return to warehouse or materials handling work.
Load Tip-Over and Falling Loads from Height
HighWalkie-stackers operating with extended masts to place loads at height present falling load hazards if load stability is compromised during lifting, lowering, or transport operations. Loads can tip from forks if loads are not properly centred on forks before lifting, if loads shift during transport due to inadequate stability or sudden equipment stops, if operators raise loads whilst equipment is on slopes creating tilted mast conditions, or if load capacity limits are exceeded causing loss of stability. Palletised loads may appear stable but can have shifted contents, damaged pallets, or asymmetric weight distribution not apparent until loads are elevated. Operating on uneven surfaces causes mast tilt affecting load security particularly when loads are raised to substantial heights. Sudden acceleration or braking whilst transporting raised loads generates dynamic forces that can overcome fork retention causing loads to slide from forks. Operators positioned near equipment to control operations are in direct fall path if loads detach from forks or tip over equipment. Load weights in construction materials handling operations can range from light packaged goods to heavy masonry materials, steel products, or dense aggregates, with heavier loads generating greater impact forces if falling. Working under or adjacent to raised loads whilst attempting to guide placement in racking positions operators directly beneath loads where fall consequences are most severe.
Consequence: Severe injuries from impact with falling loads including fractures, head trauma, spinal injuries, and potential fatalities particularly for heavy loads falling from elevated positions. Crush injuries if operators are knocked down and landed upon by fallen loads. Damage to delivered materials requiring replacement and customer disputes. Near-miss events creating anxiety about equipment safety affecting operator performance and willingness to conduct required work.
Equipment Tip-Over on Slopes or Uneven Surfaces
HighPedestrian-operated forklifts can tip forward, backward, or sideways when operating on slopes, uneven ground surfaces, or when stability limits are exceeded through improper loading or operation. Tip-over risks are highest when travelling across slopes (perpendicular to slope direction) where equipment lateral stability is compromised, when loads are raised whilst on slopes changing centre of gravity, when operating at excessive speeds on uneven surfaces causing dynamic loading, or when equipment wheels drop into holes, depressions, or onto soft surfaces creating sudden stability changes. Straddle walkie-stackers with outrigger legs have different stability characteristics than counter-balanced designs, requiring operators to understand specific stability limitations. Construction site operation on temporary surfaces, unsealed ground, or areas with service trenches and uneven compaction presents greater tip-over risks than smooth warehouse floors. Loads positioned with centres of gravity forward of equipment centreline reduce rearward stability making forward tip-over more likely during braking or descending ramps. Battery weight provides beneficial stability in normal operation but can contribute to tip-over momentum once tipping is initiated. Operators positioned alongside equipment during tip-over can be trapped beneath equipment if unable to clear tip-over path, with equipment weight causing severe crushing.
Consequence: Operators crushed or trapped under tipped equipment requiring emergency services extrication, causing severe crushing injuries, fractures, internal injuries, and potential fatalities. Equipment damage requiring repairs before return to service. Load spillage damaging materials and creating additional hazards. Project delays whilst incident investigation occurs and alternative material handling arrangements are made. Prosecution risk if investigation identifies inadequate supervision, training, or equipment maintenance contributing to tip-over.
Collision with Pedestrians and Other Equipment in Shared Spaces
MediumOperating pedestrian-operated forklifts in warehouses and construction sites where other workers conduct manual handling, order picking, or other tasks creates collision risks between equipment and pedestrians. Unlike ride-on forklifts where operators are elevated with broader fields of view, pedestrian-operated forklift operators have limited visibility when loads are raised, when walking backwards during reversing operations, or when navigating around loads positioned on equipment. Other workers focused on their own tasks may not monitor for approaching powered equipment, particularly in high-noise environments where equipment approach may not be audible. Warehouse aisles often have multiple workers conducting picking or stacking operations whilst equipment operators attempt to navigate same aisles for load placement or retrieval. Equipment speeds whilst unladen can be relatively high compared to loaded operation, with operators sometimes moving quickly between tasks without adequate awareness of other workers. Congested loading areas where delivery vehicles, forklift operations, and manual handling occur simultaneously create complex traffic situations with numerous potential conflict points. Pedestrians may assume equipment operators have seen them and will yield, whilst equipment operators may be focused on load stability or navigation challenges not recognising pedestrian presence. High-visibility clothing worn by workers provides some collision protection but is ineffective if equipment operators are not looking in directions where pedestrians are positioned.
Consequence: Pedestrians struck by equipment causing impact injuries including fractures, soft tissue injuries, and potential crush injuries if pedestrians are knocked down and equipment travels over them. Head injuries from impacts with raised equipment components including masts or overhead guards. Psychological impacts affecting both injured pedestrians and equipment operators involved in collisions. Project disruptions whilst investigations occur and modified traffic management is implemented.
Operator Fatigue and Musculoskeletal Strain from Extended Walking
MediumOperating pedestrian-operated forklifts requires operators to walk behind or alongside equipment throughout entire shifts, typically covering substantial distances in warehouse or construction site environments. This sustained walking, combined with manual effort to control equipment tiller handles, creates cumulative fatigue and musculoskeletal strain affecting operator alertness and capacity to respond to hazards. Operators may walk 10-20 kilometres or more during extended shifts, with additional physical effort from operating equipment controls, manually positioning loads when required, and maintaining posture necessary for equipment operation. Tiller handle operation requires sustained grip strength and arm positioning that can cause hand, wrist, and shoulder strain particularly when operating continuously without adequate breaks. Cold storage operations compound fatigue through additional thermal stress requiring extra physical effort to maintain body temperature. Concrete warehouse floors provide hard walking surfaces increasing impact forces on feet, ankles, and knees compared to softer surfaces. Equipment vibration transmitted through tiller handles can cause hand-arm vibration syndrome with prolonged exposure. Fatigue reduces operator alertness increasing likelihood of control errors, misjudgement of clearances or stability limits, and delayed reactions to developing hazards. End-of-shift fatigue is highest when incidents are statistically more likely to occur, compounding risks from reduced vigilance.
Consequence: Musculoskeletal disorders including back pain, knee injuries, foot pain, and hand-arm vibration syndrome requiring medical treatment and potential time off work. Cumulative fatigue increasing incident risk through reduced alertness and delayed reactions. Long-term chronic pain affecting quality of life and capacity to continue manual handling and materials handling work. Fatigue-related errors causing load spills, collisions, or equipment damage requiring investigation and corrective actions.