Comprehensive SWMS for Controlling Respirable Crystalline Silica Exposure

Silica Dust Safe Work Method Statement

2,000+ Australian Businesses Trust OneClickSWMS
Generate SWMS NowView Sample PDF

No credit card required • Instant access • 100% compliant in every Australian state

5 sec
Creation Time
100%
Compliant
2,000+
Companies
$3.6K
Fines Avoided

Avoid WHS penalties up to $3.6M—issue compliant SWMS to every crew before work starts.

Respirable crystalline silica exposure from cutting, grinding, drilling, and sanding construction materials represents one of the most serious occupational health hazards in Australian construction, causing silicosis, lung cancer, and chronic respiratory disease. This invisible dust contains particles small enough to penetrate deep into lung tissue, triggering irreversible scarring and progressive respiratory failure. This SWMS addresses the critical control requirements for managing silica exposure including elimination through work method substitution, engineering controls through dust extraction systems, administrative controls through work practices, and respiratory protection in compliance with Australian WHS legislation and the workplace exposure standard of 0.05 mg/m³.

Start Generating SWMSSee How It Works

Unlimited drafts • Built-in WHS compliance • Works across every Australian state

Overview

What this SWMS covers

Respirable crystalline silica is a microscopic mineral dust generated when materials containing crystalline silica are cut, ground, drilled, crushed, or abraded. Crystalline silica is one of the most abundant minerals on earth, occurring naturally in sand, stone, concrete, brick, mortar, and many construction products. When these materials are mechanically processed, they release airborne dust containing silica particles. Particles smaller than 10 micrometres are classified as respirable, meaning they can penetrate deep into the alveoli of the lungs where they lodge permanently and trigger inflammatory responses leading to irreversible lung scarring and disease. The health consequences of silica exposure are severe and include silicosis, a progressive and irreversible lung disease characterized by inflammation and scarring of lung tissue leading to breathing difficulties and respiratory failure. There is no cure for silicosis once lung damage occurs. Beyond silicosis, crystalline silica is classified as a Group 1 human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, causing lung cancer even in workers without silicosis. Additional health impacts include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), kidney disease, and autoimmune disorders. Recent clusters of severe silicosis cases in Australian construction workers, including workers in their 30s and 40s requiring lung transplants or dying from respiratory failure after relatively short exposure periods, have created urgent regulatory focus on silica exposure control. Construction activities generating significant silica exposure include cutting, grinding, or core drilling of concrete, masonry, or stone, abrasive blasting using silica-containing abrasives, jackhammering or chipping of concrete, demolition of concrete or masonry structures, dry sweeping or compressed air blowing of silica-containing dust, cutting or grinding of fiber cement products, sanding or grinding of render or plaster finishes, and crushing or processing of stone or concrete materials. The amount of dust generated and the silica concentration vary based on the materials being worked, with engineered stone containing 90-95% crystalline silica representing the highest exposure risk, natural stone typically 20-40% silica content, concrete and masonry 20-30% silica, and plasterboard 1-5% silica. Despite lower percentage content, high-volume cutting or grinding of lower-silica materials can still create exposure exceeding workplace standards. The Australian workplace exposure standard for respirable crystalline silica is 0.05 mg/m³ averaged over an 8-hour work shift, a level established to protect workers from silicosis and other health effects. This extremely low exposure limit reflects the severity of silica-related disease, and means that very small amounts of visible dust can contain silica concentrations exceeding safe levels. For context, the exposure standard is approximately equivalent to one grain of sugar dissolved in an Olympic swimming pool—highlighting how challenging it is to achieve through visual observation alone. Exposure monitoring using specialized air sampling equipment and laboratory analysis is required to verify exposure levels are below the standard. However, many construction activities involving power tools without dust controls generate exposures 10-100 times higher than the workplace standard. Since 2018, Australian workplace health and safety regulators have intensified enforcement around silica exposure, conducting targeted inspection campaigns in construction and stone industries, issuing immediate prohibition notices where inadequate dust controls are observed, and prosecuting companies and directors for serious silica exposure breaches. Several high-profile prosecutions with penalties exceeding $500,000 have occurred where workers developed silicosis due to inadequate dust controls. This regulatory environment, combined with the medical evidence of severe health consequences from even short-duration exposures, makes comprehensive silica dust control an absolute priority for construction businesses. The hierarchy of controls must be systematically applied: eliminating silica-generating work through alternative methods where possible, implementing engineering controls such as on-tool water suppression or local exhaust ventilation to capture dust at source, using administrative controls including work permits and exposure monitoring, and providing personal protective equipment including fitted respiratory protection as backup where exposure cannot be adequately controlled through higher-level measures.

Create Custom Silica Dust SWMSDownload Sample SWMSView All Plastering Documents

Fully editable, audit-ready, and aligned to Australian WHS standards.

Why this SWMS matters

Controlling respirable crystalline silica exposure is critical to preventing irreversible and potentially fatal lung disease in construction workers, with recent Australian cases demonstrating that even workers with relatively short exposure durations can develop advanced silicosis. Unlike many occupational hazards with immediate consequences, silica disease has a latency period ranging from months to decades between exposure and symptom development, meaning workers may accumulate severe lung damage before becoming aware of the hazard. This latency creates a false sense of security where the absence of immediate symptoms does not indicate safe working conditions. Recent medical surveillance has identified accelerating silicosis cases among Australian construction workers, with some diagnosed in their 30s after as little as 5-10 years of exposure to inadequately controlled silica dust. Silicosis is irreversible and progressive, meaning once lung damage begins, it continues even after exposure ceases. The disease progresses through stages from simple silicosis with scattered lung nodules, to complicated silicosis with progressive massive fibrosis where large areas of lung tissue are destroyed, to end-stage disease requiring oxygen supplementation or lung transplantation. There is no medical treatment that reverses silica-induced lung damage. Workers diagnosed with silicosis face chronic breathlessness, reduced exercise tolerance, susceptibility to respiratory infections, progression to respiratory failure, and significantly reduced life expectancy. Many workers are forced to retire from construction careers, lose income capacity, and face ongoing medical expenses. The personal, family, and economic impacts are devastating, with affected workers describing the disease as a 'death sentence' imposed by unsafe work practices. Under the Work Health and Safety Act 2011 and Work Health and Safety Regulations, persons conducting a business or undertaking have specific duties regarding hazardous chemical exposure including airborne contaminants like crystalline silica. These duties include identifying whether hazardous chemicals are present or used in the workplace, assessing risks from exposure, implementing control measures following the hierarchy of controls to eliminate or minimize exposure, providing information and training to workers, and implementing health monitoring where workers are at risk of exposure. For silica, this means businesses must identify which work activities generate respirable crystalline silica, measure or reasonably estimate exposure levels, implement controls to reduce exposure below the workplace exposure standard of 0.05 mg/m³, provide and maintain dust control equipment, train workers on silica hazards and controls, and arrange baseline and periodic health monitoring for workers with regular silica exposure. Regulatory enforcement around silica has intensified dramatically since 2018, with SafeWork authorities in all states conducting targeted silica inspection programs. Common findings resulting in prohibition notices and prosecutions include dry cutting or grinding of concrete or masonry without dust controls, use of dust extraction equipment that is not operating or has inadequate performance, failure to provide respiratory protection or use of unfiltered disposable masks instead of fitted P2 respirators, absence of health monitoring programs for exposed workers, and lack of training on silica hazards and controls. Penalties for serious silica contraventions have exceeded $500,000 for companies and $100,000 for individuals, with some cases resulting in criminal convictions for directors. Beyond financial penalties, directors and officers can face personal liability including disqualification from managing companies and imprisonment for reckless conduct causing serious injury or death. From a business perspective, silica-related litigation is emerging as a major liability issue. Workers diagnosed with silicosis are pursuing common law damages claims against employers for negligent silica exposure, with settlements and court awards reaching millions of dollars for severe cases involving young workers with advanced disease. Insurance coverage for silica claims may be limited or denied where insurers can demonstrate deliberate non-compliance with known safety requirements. The reputational damage from high-profile silicosis cases, regulatory prosecutions, and media attention creates business risks including loss of contracts, difficulty recruiting workers, and exclusion from tender opportunities for principal contractors implementing silica safety requirements.

Reinforce licensing, insurance, and regulator expectations for Silica Dust Safe Work Method Statement crews before they mobilise.

Hazard identification

Surface the critical risks tied to this work scope and communicate them to every worker.

Risk register

Silicosis from Respirable Crystalline Silica Inhalation

High

Silicosis is an irreversible and progressive lung disease caused by inhalation of respirable crystalline silica particles that lodge in lung alveoli and trigger inflammatory scarring. When silica particles under 10 micrometres are inhaled, they penetrate to the deepest portions of the lungs where they cannot be cleared by normal lung cleaning mechanisms. The immune system attempts to eliminate the foreign particles by surrounding them with inflammatory cells, but silica particles are resistant to breakdown. This creates chronic inflammation that progressively destroys lung tissue, replacing functional alveoli with non-functional scar tissue. The scarring reduces lung capacity, impairs oxygen exchange, and creates a stiff, non-compliant lung that requires increasing effort to breathe. Early-stage simple silicosis may be asymptomatic and detectable only through chest X-ray or CT scanning showing characteristic nodular patterns. As disease progresses, workers develop chronic cough, breathlessness on exertion, reduced exercise tolerance, and susceptibility to respiratory infections. Advanced complicated silicosis involves progressive massive fibrosis where large portions of lung are destroyed, causing severe breathlessness even at rest, chronic hypoxia requiring supplemental oxygen, cor pulmonale (heart failure from lung disease), and ultimately respiratory failure. The time from initial exposure to symptoms varies widely, with acute silicosis developing within months of very high exposure, accelerated silicosis within 5-10 years of substantial exposure, and chronic silicosis developing over 10-30 years of lower-level exposure. Recent Australian cases include construction workers diagnosed with severe silicosis in their 30s requiring lung transplants, and deaths from silicosis in workers after 10-15 years of exposure to inadequately controlled dust.

Consequence: Irreversible progressive lung scarring causing chronic breathlessness and reduced lung function, progression to respiratory failure requiring oxygen therapy or lung transplantation, premature death from respiratory complications, forced retirement from construction trades, permanent disability, and reduced life expectancy. Secondary impacts including depression, financial hardship, and family stress from chronic illness.

Lung Cancer from Crystalline Silica Carcinogen Exposure

High

Crystalline silica is classified as a Group 1 human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, meaning there is sufficient evidence that silica exposure causes lung cancer in humans. The cancer risk exists even in workers without clinical silicosis, though workers with silicosis have substantially elevated lung cancer risk. The mechanism involves chronic inflammation and cellular damage from silica particles creating conditions favorable for malignant transformation of lung cells. Silica-associated lung cancer typically develops after prolonged exposure over 15-30 years, though shorter durations may cause cancer in susceptible individuals or with very high exposures. The latency period between exposure and cancer diagnosis means workers may develop disease long after leaving silica-exposed occupations. Lung cancer from silica exposure is clinically indistinguishable from lung cancer from other causes including smoking, though workers with combined silica exposure and smoking have multiplicatively higher cancer risk than either factor alone. Symptoms include persistent cough, coughing up blood, chest pain, unexplained weight loss, and breathlessness. Treatment requires surgery, chemotherapy, or radiation, with 5-year survival rates around 15-20% depending on cancer stage at diagnosis. Many silica-exposed workers with lung cancer die within 1-2 years of diagnosis.

Consequence: Development of lung cancer requiring surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation treatment with poor long-term survival rates. Premature death typically within 1-5 years of diagnosis. Loss of income during treatment. Substantial medical costs and family impacts from serious illness. Workers' compensation claims and potential common law damages litigation against employers.

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) from Dust Exposure

High

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease encompasses chronic bronchitis and emphysema, both of which can be caused or aggravated by occupational dust exposures including crystalline silica. Silica particles damage the airways and alveoli, causing chronic inflammation of bronchial tubes (bronchitis) and destruction of alveolar walls reducing lung elasticity (emphysema). COPD develops gradually over years of exposure, with initial symptoms including chronic cough with phlegm production, wheezing, and breathlessness during physical exertion. As disease progresses, breathlessness occurs with minimal exertion or even at rest, frequent respiratory infections develop, chronic hypoxia causes fatigue and reduced quality of life, and acute exacerbations require hospitalization. Unlike silicosis which has a specific nodular pattern on imaging, COPD shows airway thickening and lung hyperinflation. The combination of occupational silica exposure and cigarette smoking creates synergistic effects where disease severity exceeds what would be expected from either exposure alone. Treatment is symptomatic including bronchodilators, corticosteroids, supplemental oxygen for advanced disease, and pulmonary rehabilitation, but lung damage cannot be reversed. Workers with COPD experience progressive disability, are frequently unable to continue physically demanding construction work, and face increased risk of respiratory infections including pneumonia which can be fatal in advanced disease.

Consequence: Progressive breathlessness and chronic cough reducing work capacity and quality of life, forced early retirement from construction trades, chronic disability requiring ongoing medication and oxygen therapy, frequent hospitalizations for acute exacerbations, increased susceptibility to fatal respiratory infections, and premature death from respiratory failure.

Acute High-Dose Silica Exposure from Uncontrolled Cutting or Grinding

High

Certain construction activities generate extremely high silica dust concentrations that can cause acute silicosis after months rather than years of exposure, or create immediate respiratory symptoms requiring medical treatment. Uncontrolled dry cutting or grinding of materials with high silica content including concrete, masonry, stone, and particularly engineered stone containing 90-95% crystalline silica creates dense visible dust clouds where silica concentrations may be 50-100 times the workplace exposure standard. Working in these dust clouds without effective respiratory protection can cause acute silicosis within 6-24 months of high-intensity exposure, or even faster with extreme exposures. Acute silicosis has a different pathology than chronic silicosis, with rapid onset of severe symptoms including breathlessness, cough, fever, and weight loss, with progression to respiratory failure and death within months to 2-3 years unless lung transplantation is performed. Additionally, even single high-dose exposures can cause acute respiratory symptoms including cough, throat irritation, chest tightness, and difficulty breathing requiring medical assessment. Workers may underestimate exposure severity because they can tolerate breathing in visible dust clouds without immediate collapse, not realizing they are inhaling lethal concentrations of silica. The dust may also irritate eyes causing severe discomfort and temporary vision impairment. Bystanders and other trades working near uncontrolled silica-generating work are also exposed, potentially without awareness of the hazard.

Consequence: Acute silicosis developing within months of high-intensity exposure, causing rapid progression to respiratory failure and death or requiring urgent lung transplantation. Immediate respiratory distress requiring emergency medical treatment. Severe eye irritation and potential corneal damage. Exposure of multiple workers and bystanders creating numerous casualty scenarios. Regulatory shutdown of entire worksites and criminal prosecution of responsible parties.

Inadequate Dust Extraction Equipment Performance

Medium

Even when dust extraction systems are provided, inadequate performance due to poor design, incorrect setup, lack of maintenance, or worker circumvention can result in exposures exceeding safe limits. Common failures include vacuum extractors with insufficient airflow capacity for the power tool being used, blocked or clogged filters reducing suction, dust extraction shrouds that do not seal properly to work surfaces allowing dust escape, separation of hose connections during work, vacuum systems without adequate HEPA filtration allowing fine silica particles to pass through and be exhausted back into the air, and equipment turned off or disconnected because workers find it cumbersome or time-consuming. Some workers deliberately defeat dust extraction by removing shrouds or disconnecting hoses to improve visibility or tool maneuverability, not understanding they are creating lethal exposure levels. Additionally, incorrect use such as holding extraction shrouds away from the work surface rather than maintaining contact eliminates capture effectiveness. Equipment hired or purchased based on price rather than performance specifications may be inadequate for silica control. Without exposure monitoring or visible dust indicators, workers and supervisors may believe extraction is working adequately when measurements would show substantial exposures above safe limits.

Consequence: Continued silica exposure despite apparent use of dust extraction equipment, causing silicosis and other respiratory diseases. False sense of safety leading workers to forgo respiratory protection. Regulatory liability when inspectors or exposure monitoring reveals inadequate controls. Expensive equipment purchases that provide inadequate protection requiring replacement with proper systems.

Respiratory Protection Failures from Incorrect Selection or Poor Fit

Medium

Respiratory protective equipment is the last line of defense against silica exposure and is only effective when properly selected, fitted, and maintained. Common failures include use of nuisance dust masks or surgical masks that provide no protection against fine silica particles, use of P1 respirators that are inadequate for silica requiring minimum P2 filtration, poorly fitting respirators allowing contaminated air to leak around face seals bypassing the filter, use of respirators without fit testing to verify seal effectiveness for each individual worker, contaminated or damaged filters that have exceeded service life or been damaged, workers with beards or heavy stubble preventing effective face seal, and respirators stored in dusty environments or carried in pockets where they become contaminated before use. Some workers find respirators uncomfortable and remove them during work or wear them incorrectly such as pulled down under their chin during breaks then put back on without changing filters. Disposable respirators are often reused over multiple days when they should be single-shift use, with accumulated dust and damage reducing protection factor. The protection factor of a P2 respirator is only achieved when properly fitted to the wearer's face—poor fit can reduce protection by 90% or more, negating the intended benefit.

Consequence: Silica exposure despite wearing respiratory protection, causing silicosis and respiratory disease. False confidence in safety leading to inadequate engineering controls. Medical surveillance detecting elevated exposure biomarkers requiring work restrictions. Regulatory prosecution for inadequate respiratory protection programs. Workers' compensation claims and litigation based on inadequate PPE provision.

Absence of Health Monitoring Delaying Disease Detection

Medium

Workers with regular silica exposure require baseline and periodic health monitoring to detect early signs of lung damage before symptoms develop, allowing work modification and medical intervention to prevent disease progression. Health monitoring typically includes spirometry lung function testing measuring forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume (FEV1) at baseline and periodic intervals, with chest X-rays or low-dose CT scanning for workers with concerning symptoms or abnormal lung function. Many businesses fail to implement health monitoring programs, leaving workers unaware of developing disease until symptoms become severe. The latency period for silicosis means workers may have substantial lung damage before experiencing breathlessness or cough, and by the time symptoms develop the disease may be advanced and progressive. Early detection through health monitoring allows removal from further exposure before irreversible complications develop, provides workers with diagnosis enabling them to access medical care and workers' compensation, and identifies control failures requiring immediate workplace improvements to protect other workers. Absence of health monitoring may also indicate broader neglect of silica safety including inadequate dust controls, poor training, and lack of exposure monitoring. Workers' compensation insurers and courts view absence of health monitoring as evidence of failure to meet minimum safety standards.

Consequence: Delayed detection of silicosis allowing disease to progress to advanced stages before diagnosis, lost opportunity for early intervention and work modification to prevent progression, workers unaware they have occupational disease leading to delayed medical treatment, evidence of inadequate safety systems supporting regulatory prosecution and workers' compensation liability, and failure to identify control deficiencies creating ongoing exposure risk for entire workforce.

Control measures

Deploy layered controls aligned to the hierarchy of hazard management.

Implementation guide

Elimination of Silica-Generating Work Through Alternative Methods

Elimination

The most effective silica control is eliminating the need for cutting, grinding, drilling, or abrasive processing of silica-containing materials through work method substitution and planning. This includes using pre-cut materials ordered to exact dimensions eliminating on-site cutting, specifying alternative materials with lower or no silica content where suitable for the application, using mechanical fixing methods such as brackets or adhesives instead of masonry drilling, selecting demolition methods such as concrete crushing or sawing with full water suppression instead of jackhammering, and designing projects to minimize field modifications of masonry or concrete materials. For renovation work, planning to work around existing masonry openings rather than creating new penetrations reduces grinding and core drilling requirements. Using diamond saw cutting with full water suppression instead of abrasive cutting or grinding dramatically reduces airborne dust.

Implementation

1. During project planning and design, identify opportunities to pre-cut materials to finished dimensions using factory or off-site cutting facilities with industrial dust control rather than on-site cutting. 2. Specify products and materials with lower silica content where suitable alternatives exist for the application, particularly avoiding engineered stone products with 90-95% silica content. 3. Design mechanical fixing systems, adhesive bonding, or bracket mounting methods to attach materials to structures rather than drilling or grinding for embedded fixings. 4. For demolition work, use demolition equipment with water suppression, concrete crushers, or diamond wire sawing instead of jackhammering or percussive breaking of concrete. 5. Plan work sequences and site layouts to minimize field modifications, ensuring adequate measurements and coordination reduce cutting and grinding on site. 6. Use diamond sawing with full water suppression for necessary cutting of masonry or concrete, as wet cutting reduces dust generation by 95-99% compared to dry methods. 7. Communicate silica elimination requirements to subcontractors in tender specifications and contracts, requiring demonstration of dust control methods and equipment before work commences.

On-Tool Dust Extraction with HEPA Filtration and Adequate Airflow

Engineering

For cutting, grinding, or drilling operations that cannot be eliminated, on-tool dust extraction systems provide engineering-level control by capturing silica dust at the point of generation before it becomes airborne. Effective extraction requires proper equipment including industrial vacuum extractors with Class H HEPA filters capable of capturing particles down to 0.3 micrometres, adequate airflow capacity (typically 20-25 L/s for 125mm angle grinders, higher for larger tools), manufacturer-approved dust extraction shrouds that seal around cutting or grinding areas, and properly sized hoses maintaining airflow without restriction. The vacuum must be turned on before starting the power tool and remain operating throughout the work and for 30 seconds after work stops to capture residual dust. Extraction shrouds must be held in contact with the work surface throughout cutting or grinding—lifting the shroud allows dust escape defeating the control.

Implementation

1. Procure or hire industrial dust extraction vacuums specifically rated for silica dust control with minimum Class H HEPA filtration and airflow capacity matched to tools being used. 2. Ensure all cutting and grinding power tools are fitted with manufacturer-approved dust extraction shrouds designed for the specific tool model and connected to operating vacuum extractors. 3. Provide training on proper extraction equipment use including starting vacuum before tool, maintaining shroud contact with work surface, recognizing signs of inadequate extraction such as visible dust escape, and shutdown procedures. 4. Implement daily pre-use inspection of extraction equipment checking filter condition, hose connections, shroud seal integrity, and adequate suction using simple airflow indicators. 5. Establish filter replacement schedules based on manufacturer recommendations and visible filter loading, with adequate stock of replacement HEPA filters available on site. 6. Prohibit any cutting, grinding, or drilling of silica-containing materials without operating dust extraction connected throughout the work, enforced through supervision and work permits. 7. Conduct periodic airborne exposure monitoring using personal air sampling to verify extraction systems are achieving exposure levels below the 0.05 mg/m³ workplace standard, with monitoring results documented and communicated to workers.

Wet Suppression Methods for Cutting and Drilling Operations

Engineering

Water suppression during cutting and drilling operations is highly effective at preventing silica dust generation, with proper wet methods achieving 95-99% dust reduction compared to dry operations. This includes on-tool water delivery systems that spray water directly onto cutting or grinding surfaces, wet cutting saws with integrated water feed, core drilling equipment with water-fed bits, and manual water spraying during operations. The key is continuous water flow that keeps the material wet throughout the cutting process and prevents dust from becoming airborne. Wet methods may be combined with vacuum extraction for optimal control in enclosed spaces where wet slurry needs to be contained.

Implementation

1. Use dedicated wet-cutting saws or diamond saws with integrated water delivery systems for cutting concrete, masonry, or stone materials, ensuring continuous water flow to cutting area. 2. Ensure core drilling equipment has water-fed diamond core bits with sufficient water flow to continuously wet the cutting surface and suppress dust generation. 3. For grinding operations, use angle grinders with on-tool water delivery systems or manual water spraying to keep work surface continuously wet, though recognizing this is less effective than vacuum extraction for grinders. 4. Train operators on proper wet method use including verifying adequate water flow before starting work, maintaining continuous wetting throughout cutting, and ensuring water reaches the cutting interface not just the tool exterior. 5. Provide adequate water supply through plumbed connections, water tanks with pumps, or pressurized water containers with sufficient capacity for the work duration without interruption. 6. Establish wet slurry collection and disposal procedures particularly for internal work where wet waste creates slip hazards and must be removed, using wet vacuum collection and proper disposal. 7. Combine wet methods with vacuum extraction for internal work in occupied buildings or where wet slurry creates unacceptable mess, using systems that collect both dust and water.

Isolation and Ventilation of Dust-Generating Work Areas

Engineering

Isolating dust-generating work from other workers and occupied areas prevents exposure of bystanders and allows more effective ventilation of the dust-generating area. Physical barriers using plastic sheeting or temporary walls separate cutting or grinding areas from general work zones. Negative air pressure using exhaust ventilation prevents dust migration to adjacent areas. Outdoor work where possible uses natural ventilation to dilute and disperse dust away from worker breathing zones. Scheduling dust-generating work outside occupied hours reduces exposure of building occupants and allows more thorough cleanup before re-occupancy.

Implementation

1. Isolate cutting, grinding, or drilling work areas using physical barriers such as plastic sheeting, temporary partitions, or work enclosures that separate dust-generating operations from general work areas. 2. Implement negative air pressure in enclosed cutting areas using exhaust ventilation that creates airflow away from occupied areas toward dust collection points. 3. Conduct high-dust operations outdoors where feasible, using natural wind dilution and dispersion rather than allowing dust accumulation in enclosed spaces. 4. Schedule dust-generating work during unoccupied periods where work occurs in operating buildings, allowing thorough cleanup and ventilation before building re-occupancy. 5. Establish exclusion zones around cutting and grinding operations with signage warning of silica hazard and prohibiting entry except for workers directly involved wearing appropriate respiratory protection. 6. Provide general dilution ventilation in work areas through open doors and windows, supplementary fans to increase air changes, and exhaust ventilation in enclosed spaces. 7. Monitor adjacent areas for dust migration using visual observation and periodic air sampling, with any dust contamination requiring improved isolation or ventilation before work continues.

Mandatory Fitted Respiratory Protection for All Silica-Generating Work

PPE

Respiratory protective equipment provides essential protection when engineering controls cannot completely eliminate silica exposure, and serves as mandatory backup protection even when extraction or wet methods are used. For construction work involving cutting, grinding, or drilling of silica-containing materials, minimum P2 half-face respirators are required. P2 filters capture at least 94% of airborne particles, providing protection factors of 10 when properly fitted (reducing exposure to 1/10th of ambient levels). Respirators must be fit-tested to each individual worker's face to verify seal effectiveness, as poor-fitting respirators allow contaminated air to bypass filters. Workers with beards or heavy facial hair cannot achieve adequate seal and must either be clean-shaven when performing silica work or use powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) that do not rely on face seal.

Implementation

1. Conduct quantitative or qualitative fit testing for all workers who will wear respirators, testing each individual with the specific make and model of respirator they will use. 2. Provide adequate stocks of properly fitted respirators in multiple sizes to accommodate different facial structures, with sufficient filter supply for regular replacement. 3. Train all workers on respiratory protection including proper donning and doffing, performing user seal checks each time respirator is worn, recognizing signs of filter loading or damage requiring replacement, and limitations of respiratory protection. 4. Implement mandatory wear policies requiring fitted P2 or higher respiratory protection during all cutting, grinding, drilling, or sanding of materials containing crystalline silica, enforced through supervision and work permits. 5. Establish filter replacement schedules based on manufacturer recommendations, work intensity, and visible filter condition, typically requiring fresh filters each work shift. 6. Prohibit workers with beards or heavy facial hair from using filtering facepiece respirators for silica work, requiring either clean-shaven status or provision of positive pressure respirators that do not require face seal. 7. Provide storage solutions that protect clean respirators from contamination when not in use, educating workers to inspect filters before each use and replace if damaged or contaminated.

Baseline and Periodic Health Monitoring for Exposed Workers

Administrative

Health monitoring provides early detection of silica-related lung damage before symptoms develop, allowing work modification and medical intervention to prevent disease progression. Required health monitoring includes baseline testing before commencing regular silica-exposed work, periodic repeat testing at appropriate intervals (typically 1-3 years based on exposure intensity), and exit testing when leaving silica-exposed roles. Testing includes occupational health questionnaires documenting respiratory symptoms and work history, spirometry lung function testing measuring FVC and FEV1, and chest imaging (X-ray or low-dose CT) where indicated by symptoms or abnormal lung function.

Implementation

1. Engage occupational health providers to deliver health monitoring services including baseline testing for all workers before commencing roles with regular silica exposure. 2. Establish health monitoring schedules with periodic testing at intervals based on exposure assessment—annual testing for high-exposure roles, every 2-3 years for moderate exposure. 3. Ensure health monitoring includes detailed respiratory questionnaires, spirometry lung function testing by trained technicians using calibrated equipment, and referral for chest imaging if symptoms or abnormal results are detected. 4. Communicate health monitoring results to workers confidentially, with medical review and counseling for any abnormal findings requiring work modification or medical treatment. 5. For workers with abnormal health monitoring results indicating possible early silica disease, implement immediate work removal from silica exposure, referral to respiratory physicians for diagnostic assessment, and workplace investigation to identify control deficiencies. 6. Maintain health monitoring records for each worker documenting test dates, results, and any recommendations, retained for minimum 30 years after employment ceases as silica diseases have long latency. 7. Use health monitoring results to evaluate workplace control effectiveness—detection of multiple workers with abnormal results indicates inadequate dust controls requiring immediate improvement.

Comprehensive Silica Training and Competency Assessment

Administrative

Effective silica control requires workers to understand the severity of health hazards, recognize when they are at risk of exposure, correctly use control equipment, and follow safe work procedures. Training must go beyond generic dust awareness to cover silica-specific content including silicosis and cancer risks, the workplace exposure standard and how easily it can be exceeded, proper use and maintenance of dust extraction equipment, correct respiratory protection use including fit checking, work methods that minimize dust generation, and emergency response for equipment failure or high-exposure scenarios.

Implementation

1. Develop comprehensive silica awareness training covering health effects of silica exposure including silicosis progression and outcomes, carcinogenicity, Australian exposure standards and regulatory requirements, and recent silicosis cases in construction workers. 2. Provide hands-on training in dust control equipment use including dust extraction system setup, maintaining shroud contact during work, recognizing inadequate extraction performance, filter inspection and replacement, and shutdown procedures. 3. Train workers on respiratory protection use including proper donning and doffing, performing positive and negative pressure seal checks, filter replacement criteria, and recognizing when fit-testing is required. 4. Conduct practical competency assessment where workers demonstrate correct dust extraction setup, proper respiratory protection use, and recognition of control failure scenarios requiring work stoppage. 5. Provide refresher training annually or when new equipment or work methods are introduced, reinforcing critical safety messages about silica hazards and control requirements. 6. Document training completion for all workers with records including training date, content covered, competency assessment results, and trainer credentials retained for verification. 7. Implement toolbox talks specifically addressing silica before commencing high-risk activities such as concrete grinding or cutting, reviewing controls and ensuring all workers understand their roles in maintaining safe conditions.

Download complete control procedures

Personal protective equipment

P2 Respirator (Fitted)

Requirement: Half-face P2 respirator fitted to individual worker per AS/NZS 1716 with fit-testing verification

When: Mandatory during all cutting, grinding, drilling, sanding, or abrasive processing of materials containing crystalline silica. Must be properly fitted with verified seal check before each use. Replace filters per manufacturer specifications or when breathing resistance increases.

Safety Glasses with Side Shields

Requirement: Impact-rated safety glasses compliant with AS/NZS 1337 with side protection

When: Required during all dust-generating operations to protect against airborne particles and fragments from cutting or grinding. Full face shields provide additional protection during intensive grinding work.

Disposable Coveralls

Requirement: Type 5 particulate-barrier coveralls or work clothing laundered separately from household laundry

When: Recommended for intensive silica work to prevent dust accumulation on clothing that can create secondary exposure when clothing is removed or laundered. Prevents take-home contamination affecting workers' families.

Steel Toe Cap Safety Boots

Requirement: Certified to AS/NZS 2210.3 with steel toe caps and penetration-resistant soles

When: Required during all construction work to protect feet from falling materials, dropped tools, and crush injuries from equipment or materials.

High-Visibility Clothing

Requirement: Class D Day/Night compliant with AS/NZS 4602.1

When: Mandatory on construction sites to ensure workers are visible to mobile plant operators, delivery drivers, and other trades working in the area.

Hard Hat

Requirement: Type 1 helmet compliant with AS/NZS 1801

When: Required when working in areas with overhead hazards or where falling objects present risks. Mandatory on construction sites with overhead work or mobile plant operations.

Hearing Protection

Requirement: Class 4 or 5 earplugs or earmuffs per AS/NZS 1270 when operating powered equipment

When: Required when using cutting, grinding, or drilling equipment that generates noise exceeding 85 dB(A) to prevent noise-induced hearing loss from prolonged exposure.

Inspections & checks

Before work starts

  • ✓Verify dust extraction equipment is operational with HEPA filters in good condition, adequate airflow capacity, and all hose connections secure
  • ✓Check power tools are fitted with manufacturer-approved dust extraction shrouds properly attached and sealed
  • ✓Test vacuum extractor operation and verify adequate suction at tool connection point before commencing work
  • ✓Inspect respiratory protection to ensure fitted P2 or higher respirators are available in correct sizes for all workers with clean, undamaged filters
  • ✓Verify workers have current fit-test records for respirators they will use, with fit-testing completed within previous 12 months
  • ✓Confirm wet suppression systems have adequate water supply and delivery to cutting or drilling points if wet methods are being used
  • ✓Review work area for opportunities to isolate dust-generating operations from other workers and occupied areas
  • ✓Verify emergency procedures are understood including response to dust extraction equipment failure or high-exposure scenarios

During work

  • ✓Monitor dust extraction performance continuously, watching for any visible dust escape indicating inadequate capture requiring work cessation
  • ✓Check workers are maintaining proper extraction shroud contact with work surfaces throughout cutting and grinding operations
  • ✓Verify respirators remain properly worn with good face seal throughout work, not pulled down or removed during brief breaks
  • ✓Observe for signs of extraction system problems including reduced suction, hose disconnections, or clogged filters requiring immediate attention
  • ✓Monitor isolation barriers and ventilation to ensure dust is not migrating to adjacent work areas or occupied spaces
  • ✓Check wet suppression systems maintain continuous water flow to cutting surfaces without interruption
  • ✓Watch for worker behaviors indicating training deficiencies such as removing extraction shrouds, defeating dust controls, or improper respirator use

After work

  • ✓Clean extraction equipment shrouds and hoses to remove accumulated dust using HEPA vacuum or wet wiping methods, not compressed air or dry brushing
  • ✓Empty and dispose of vacuum collector contents into sealed bags to prevent dust re-release, using wet methods if necessary
  • ✓Inspect and replace loaded HEPA filters per manufacturer schedules, documenting filter condition and replacement in equipment logs
  • ✓Clean work area using HEPA-filtered vacuum or wet methods to remove settled dust, never using compressed air or dry sweeping which re-suspends silica particles
  • ✓Inspect respiratory protection filters and replace if used during work shift or showing signs of loading or damage
  • ✓Document any equipment issues, extraction failures, or control deficiencies encountered during work for supervisor review and corrective action
  • ✓Remove and launder contaminated work clothing separately from household laundry to prevent take-home silica exposure affecting workers' families

Step-by-step work procedure

Give supervisors and crews a clear, auditable sequence for the task.

Field ready
1

Conduct Pre-Work Assessment and Implement Elimination Controls

Before commencing any work that may generate silica dust, conduct thorough assessment to identify opportunities to eliminate silica-generating activities through work method substitution. Review project drawings and specifications to determine if materials can be pre-cut to final dimensions off-site rather than field cutting. Consider alternative fixing methods such as brackets or adhesives instead of drilling into masonry or concrete. For concrete removal, evaluate whether mechanical crushing or water-suppressed sawing can replace jackhammering or percussive breaking. Consult with project designers about specifying lower-silica alternative materials where suitable. Document the assessment outcomes identifying which silica-generating activities have been eliminated and which require engineering and administrative controls because elimination is not feasible.

Safety considerations

Elimination is the most effective control and must be seriously pursued rather than defaulting to dust extraction or respiratory protection. Challenge assumptions about the necessity of cutting, grinding, or drilling on site—with proper planning, many field modifications can be eliminated. Consider total project costs including health monitoring, exposure monitoring, dust control equipment, and potential workers' compensation liability which often exceed the cost of pre-cutting materials or alternative methods. Document elimination assessment to demonstrate hierarchy of controls compliance to regulatory inspectors.

2

Set Up and Verify Dust Extraction Equipment Performance

Before commencing cutting, grinding, or drilling work, set up dust extraction systems and verify adequate performance. Position industrial HEPA vacuum extractor in stable location with clear access, ensuring unit is properly grounded if using electrical power tools. Inspect vacuum to confirm it has Class H HEPA filter installed (not ordinary dust filters which allow fine silica particles to pass through). Check filter condition—if visibly loaded or vacuum has reduced suction, replace filter before use. Connect extraction hose to power tool dust shroud, verifying all connections are secure and sealed with no gaps allowing dust escape. For wet suppression systems, verify adequate water supply and proper delivery to cutting or drilling points. Test vacuum operation by starting unit and verifying strong suction at the tool end of the hose. If using powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs), check battery charge and filter condition. Ensure adequate backup filters and consumables are available on site for the work duration.

Safety considerations

Dust extraction must use industrial vacuums designed for hazardous dust collection with Class H HEPA filtration—household vacuums or shop vacs without HEPA filters exhaust fine silica particles back into the air providing no protection. Verify extraction shroud is manufacturer-approved for the specific tool model, as improvised or incorrect shrouds provide inadequate dust capture. Test vacuum airflow before starting work—weak suction indicates clogged filter or equipment malfunction requiring correction before work proceeds. Position extraction vacuum to avoid creating trip hazards from hoses while maintaining easy access to power controls.

3

Don Fitted Respiratory Protection and Perform Seal Checks

Before entering areas where silica-generating work is occurring or commencing cutting, grinding, or drilling operations, put on properly fitted respiratory protective equipment. Select P2 half-face respirator that has been fit-tested to your individual face, ensuring it is clean with new or recently installed filters. Position respirator on face and adjust head straps to achieve snug fit without over-tightening. Perform positive pressure seal check by covering exhalation valve with hand and breathing out gently—respirator should bulge slightly outward and no air should leak around face seal. Perform negative pressure seal check by covering filter surfaces with hands and breathing in gently—respirator should pull tight against face with no air leaking in around seal. If either check fails, re-adjust straps and repeat checks. If proper seal cannot be achieved, try a different respirator size or model that has been fit-tested for you. For workers with beards or heavy facial hair, standard filtering facepiece respirators cannot achieve proper seal—use powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) instead.

Safety considerations

Respirators only provide rated protection when properly fitted to individual faces—poor seal allows contaminated air to bypass filters negating protection. Fit-testing by qualified providers is mandatory and must be repeated annually or if facial characteristics change significantly. Beards, heavy stubble, deep facial scars, or other conditions preventing seal make filtering facepiece respirators ineffective—workers in these situations must use alternative respiratory protection such as PAPRs or be clean-shaven when performing silica work. Do not rely on perceived comfort or 'feels tight' as indicators of proper fit—only formal fit-testing and seal checks verify adequate protection.

4

Establish Work Area Isolation and Signage

Before commencing dust-generating operations, establish physical barriers and exclusion zones to prevent exposure of other workers and building occupants. For indoor work, erect temporary barriers using plastic sheeting or partition walls to isolate cutting or grinding areas from general work zones. Seal gaps around barriers using tape to prevent dust migration. If work is in occupied buildings, coordinate with building management to notify occupants and restrict access to affected areas. Post warning signage at all access points indicating 'Silica Dust Hazard - Authorized Personnel Only - Respiratory Protection Required'. Establish negative air pressure if possible by using exhaust ventilation that draws air from surrounding areas into the work zone and exhausts it outdoors through HEPA filtration. For outdoor work, establish exclusion zones using barriers, tape, or cones to keep unauthorized personnel at safe distances downwind from dust-generating operations. Ensure adequate general ventilation through open doors and windows supplemented by fans if needed.

Safety considerations

Bystanders and other trades working near silica-generating operations can receive substantial exposure without awareness of the hazard—physical isolation and exclusion zones are essential. Negative air pressure prevents dust migration to occupied areas but requires exhaust air to be HEPA filtered before discharge or exhausted to unoccupied outdoor areas. Do not rely solely on signage—physical barriers that require deliberate decision to breach provide more effective exclusion than signs that can be ignored. Monitor adjacent areas for dust contamination visually and through periodic air sampling, with any detected dust requiring improved isolation.

5

Commence Work with Continuous Dust Extraction and Monitoring

With extraction system set up, respiratory protection properly fitted, and work area isolated, commence cutting, grinding, or drilling operations using systematic dust control procedures. Start vacuum extractor first, then start power tool, ensuring extraction is operating before dust generation begins. Maintain continuous contact between extraction shroud and work surface throughout cutting or grinding—any gap allows dust escape. Work at steady, controlled pace avoiding excessive tool pressure which can overwhelm extraction capacity. For wet cutting systems, verify continuous water flow to cutting surface before starting and throughout work. Monitor extraction performance continuously watching for any visible dust escape from shroud edges or tool contact point. Any visible dust indicates inadequate control requiring immediate work stoppage to improve shroud seal, clear clogged filters, increase water flow, or verify extraction system is functioning properly. Take regular breaks to prevent fatigue that impairs attention to proper shroud positioning and control technique.

Safety considerations

Visible dust clouds indicate extraction or wet suppression has failed—work must stop immediately and controls must be corrected before resuming. Never continue working when dust is visible even briefly, as short high-exposure events can create substantial cumulative exposure. Maintain shroud contact with work surface constantly—workers lifting shrouds for better visibility or easier tool manipulation defeat the entire control system. Replace extraction filters promptly when suction decreases indicating filter loading. Monitor battery charge on battery-powered extraction systems to prevent mid-work shutdown. Keep extraction hoses clear of pinch points, sharp edges, or moving equipment that could damage hoses and interrupt extraction.

6

Clean Work Area Using Wet Methods or HEPA Vacuum

After completing dust-generating work or at end of work shift, thoroughly clean work area to remove settled silica dust using only wet methods or HEPA-filtered vacuum cleaning—never use compressed air or dry sweeping which re-suspends silica particles creating severe exposure. For settled dust on floors, walls, and equipment, use wet wiping with damp cloths or wet mopping, disposing of cloths in sealed bags. Use HEPA-filtered vacuum for areas where wet cleaning is not suitable, such as electrical equipment or sensitive materials. Clean from top to bottom and from furthest point toward exit to avoid walking through or disturbing cleaned areas. Remove and properly dispose of isolation barriers that have become contaminated with dust. Clean extraction equipment shrouds, hoses, and vacuum exterior using wet wiping or HEPA vacuum. Empty vacuum collector into sealed bags, using wet methods if necessary to prevent dust escape during emptying. Inspect and replace loaded HEPA filters, sealing old filters in bags before disposal.

Safety considerations

Compressed air or dry sweeping creates silica exposures many times higher than the original dust-generating work—absolutely prohibit these cleaning methods anywhere silica dust is present. Workers performing cleanup must wear respiratory protection as cleaning activities re-suspend dust even when using proper wet or HEPA vacuum methods. Dispose of contaminated materials in sealed bags clearly marked as containing silica dust to warn waste handlers. Do not contaminate household vacuum cleaners or cleaning equipment with silica dust as this creates take-home exposure affecting workers' families. Verify all settled dust has been removed before opening work area isolation barriers to prevent contaminating surrounding areas.

7

Document Work and Conduct Post-Work Review

After completing silica-generating work and cleanup, document the work performed, control measures used, any issues encountered, and exposure estimates for workers involved. Record identifies workers who performed the work (for health monitoring records), materials cut or ground (to estimate silica content), duration of work (for exposure calculations), control measures used (dust extraction specifications, wet methods, respiratory protection), any control failures or visible dust escapes that occurred, and corrective actions taken. This documentation supports health monitoring programs by identifying which workers require monitoring, provides evidence of control hierarchy implementation for regulatory purposes, and creates records for future reference if workers develop health effects years later. Conduct brief post-work review with crew discussing what worked well, any problems encountered with extraction or other controls, and improvements for future similar work. Communicate control failures or inadequate equipment to supervisors for corrective action before next use.

Safety considerations

Documentation creates the evidence trail demonstrating compliance with WHS duties and supports workers' compensation or litigation if workers subsequently develop silica-related disease. Records must identify specific workers exposed and exposure estimates, as generic statements like 'crew performed grinding work' do not provide adequate information for future health monitoring or claims assessment. Record control failures and visible dust escapes even if brief, as these indicate deficiencies requiring correction and may represent the highest exposure episodes. Maintain records for minimum 30 years as silica diseases have long latency and workers may develop symptoms decades after exposure. Provide copies of exposure records to workers so they can maintain personal records of silica exposure history throughout their careers even if changing employers.

Get risk assessment & procedures

Frequently asked questions

What is the Australian workplace exposure standard for respirable crystalline silica?

The Australian workplace exposure standard (WES) for respirable crystalline silica is 0.05 mg/m³, measured as an 8-hour time-weighted average. This means the average exposure over a full work shift must not exceed 0.05 milligrams of respirable crystalline silica per cubic metre of air. This is an extremely low concentration reflecting the severe health hazards of silica exposure. To put this in perspective, the exposure standard is approximately equivalent to one grain of sugar dissolved in an Olympic swimming pool. Common construction activities involving power tools without dust controls can generate exposures 10-100 times higher than the exposure standard. For example, dry cutting of concrete with an angle grinder can create exposures of 1-5 mg/m³, which is 20-100 times the WES. Dry grinding or sanding of materials can exceed 2-10 mg/m³. Even brief exposures at these elevated levels contribute significantly to cumulative risk when calculated over a work shift. The exposure standard applies to all workers including employees, contractors, and labor hire workers. Employers must ensure exposure does not exceed the WES through implementation of control measures following the hierarchy of controls. If exposure monitoring reveals levels above the WES, immediate corrective action is required including improved engineering controls, work practice changes, and enhanced respiratory protection until exposure is reduced below the standard. Repeated or prolonged exposure above the WES significantly increases risk of silicosis, lung cancer, and other respiratory diseases, with some recent cases of severe silicosis occurring in workers with relatively short exposure durations measured in months to a few years rather than decades.

How often do workers need health monitoring for silica exposure?

Workers with regular exposure to respirable crystalline silica require baseline health monitoring before commencing silica-exposed work, periodic repeat monitoring at intervals based on exposure level, and exit monitoring when leaving silica-exposed roles. For workers with high-intensity exposure such as those regularly cutting, grinding, or drilling silica-containing materials, annual health monitoring is recommended. For moderate-level exposure, monitoring every 2-3 years may be adequate. The specific monitoring frequency should be determined by occupational health professionals based on exposure assessment results and individual worker factors. Baseline health monitoring establishes each worker's lung function and respiratory status before silica exposure, providing a reference point for comparison in future testing. This baseline typically includes respiratory symptom questionnaire, occupational and smoking history, spirometry lung function testing measuring FVC and FEV1, and in some programs, chest X-ray. Periodic monitoring repeats these assessments to detect early changes indicating developing disease. Workers with abnormal results require more frequent monitoring, diagnostic evaluation by respiratory physicians, and work modification to eliminate further exposure. Exit monitoring when workers leave silica-exposed positions provides final assessment of respiratory status and may detect disease that developed near the end of employment. Additionally, workers should be informed they should seek ongoing medical surveillance even after leaving silica-exposed work, as diseases can develop or progress years after exposure ceases. All health monitoring must be provided at no cost to workers, conducted during work hours, and results must be communicated confidentially to workers with medical counseling about significance and recommendations. Workers diagnosed with silica-related disease through health monitoring are entitled to workers' compensation including medical treatment, income replacement, and lump sum payments for permanent impairment. The detection of silica disease in any worker triggers mandatory workplace investigation to identify control failures and prevent additional cases, often resulting in substantial safety system improvements protecting the entire workforce.

What type of vacuum is required for silica dust extraction?

Silica dust extraction requires industrial vacuum extractors specifically designed for hazardous dust collection, with Class H HEPA filtration as minimum specification. Class H HEPA filters capture at least 99.995% of particles down to 0.3 micrometres, which is essential for retaining respirable silica particles that are predominantly in the 0.5-5 micrometre size range. Standard shop vacuums, household vacuum cleaners, or industrial vacuums with ordinary dust filters (Class L or M) are completely inadequate for silica dust as they allow fine silica particles to pass through the filter and be exhausted back into the air, providing no worker protection while creating a false sense of safety. The vacuum must also have adequate airflow capacity for the power tool being used—minimum 20-25 litres per second (L/s) for 125mm angle grinders, with higher airflow required for larger tools. Airflow can be measured using simple anemometers or verified through manufacturer specifications and periodic testing. The vacuum system must include appropriate pre-filters or cyclonic separation to extend HEPA filter life, as fine silica dust loads filters quickly. Australian Standards AS/NZS 60335.2.69 covers vacuum cleaners for industrial use including requirements for hazardous dust collection. Look for vacuums specifically marketed for construction dust control or silica dust extraction, with features including automatic filter cleaning systems to maintain airflow, sealed construction preventing dust escape, safe filter change systems allowing filter removal without worker exposure, and robust construction suitable for construction site conditions. Major manufacturers including Festool, Hilti, Makita, Milwaukee, and Nilfisk produce vacuum systems rated for silica dust extraction. When hiring or purchasing extraction equipment, specify silica dust control as the requirement rather than general dust extraction, and verify the equipment has Class H HEPA filtration confirmed by manufacturer specifications or certification. Inadequate extraction equipment is a common deficiency identified in regulatory inspections, with inspectors issuing prohibition notices where equipment lacks proper HEPA filtration or has insufficient airflow for the tools being used.

Can workers with beards use P2 respirators for silica protection?

No, workers with beards, heavy stubble, or other facial hair passing between face and respirator sealing surface cannot use filtering facepiece respirators (disposable P2 masks) or half-face P2 reusable respirators for silica protection, as facial hair prevents the tight face seal required for effective protection. Respirator protection relies on all inhaled air passing through the filter—any gap in the face seal allows contaminated air to bypass the filter, which can reduce protection by 90% or more making the respirator essentially useless even though the worker believes they are protected. Even small amounts of stubble growth can break the seal, which is why workers using filtering facepiece respirators in high-hazard environments must be clean-shaven. For workers who cannot or will not be clean-shaven, alternative respiratory protection options include powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) which use a battery-powered blower to draw air through filters and deliver it to a loose-fitting hood or helmet, providing protection without requiring a face seal. PAPRs with P3 filters provide high protection factors suitable for silica dust exposure. Another option is full-face negative pressure respirators with P3 filters, where the face seal is outside the beard area, though this still requires the seal area to be clean-shaven. Employers must assess whether workers' facial characteristics allow effective respirator seal through formal fit-testing, which cannot be passed if facial hair interferes with sealing surfaces. If workers cannot achieve proper fit with filtering facepiece or half-face respirators due to beards, facial scars, unusual facial structures, or missing teeth, the employer must provide alternative respiratory protection such as PAPRs or implement enhanced engineering controls that eliminate the need for respiratory protection. Simply providing a P2 mask to a bearded worker and instructing them to wear it does not meet WHS requirements for respiratory protection and creates liability exposure if the worker develops silica disease. The cost of PAPRs (approximately $1,500-3,000 per unit) is minor compared to potential workers' compensation liability and prosecution penalties for inadequate respiratory protection, making provision of appropriate equipment for bearded workers a straightforward risk management decision.

What should I do if dust extraction equipment fails during work?

If dust extraction equipment fails during cutting, grinding, or drilling of silica-containing materials, immediately stop work and do not resume until extraction is restored to full functionality or alternative controls are implemented. Equipment failure includes loss of suction indicating clogged filters or mechanical problems, hose disconnection, shroud seal failure allowing visible dust escape, electrical power loss, or any other condition preventing effective dust capture. The immediate response is to shut down the power tool, move to an uncontaminated area, and assess the problem. Common failures and corrective actions include clogged HEPA filters requiring filter replacement (maintain spare filters on site for this purpose), hose disconnections requiring secure reconnection and verification of seal integrity, shroud seal degradation requiring shroud replacement, electrical power loss requiring connection to alternative power source or generator, and mechanical pump failure requiring use of backup extraction unit or hiring replacement equipment. If the problem cannot be immediately corrected, work must stop until proper extraction is available. Do not attempt to continue working without extraction using only respiratory protection, as this creates excessive exposure that respiratory protection alone may not adequately control, particularly for prolonged work durations. Document all extraction failures including date, location, equipment involved, nature of the failure, corrective action taken, and any period where work continued with inadequate dust control (there should be none if procedures are properly followed). Frequent or repeated equipment failures indicate inadequate maintenance or equipment unsuitable for the application, requiring replacement with more robust systems. After restoration of extraction, verify proper operation through visual observation of dust capture and, if available, airflow measurement before resuming work. Consider conducting exposure monitoring following any extended equipment failure to verify workers were not over-exposed, with results used to evaluate control effectiveness and identify any workers requiring accelerated health monitoring based on high-exposure episodes. Use equipment failure incidents as learning opportunities to improve preventive maintenance, backup equipment availability, and worker training in rapid recognition and response to control failures.

Are workers entitled to copies of their silica exposure and health monitoring records?

Yes, workers have legal rights to access their exposure monitoring results and health monitoring records under both WHS legislation and health records laws. Upon request, employers must provide workers with copies of all personal exposure monitoring results including air sampling data showing respirable crystalline silica concentrations measured in their breathing zone during work activities. This includes monitoring reports showing measured exposures, laboratory analysis results, and interpretation of whether exposures exceed the workplace exposure standard. For health monitoring, workers are entitled to receive results of all health monitoring tests including spirometry reports, chest imaging results, occupational health questionnaires, and any medical recommendations arising from the monitoring. These records belong to the worker and must be provided in clear, understandable format with explanation of what results mean for their health. Workers should maintain personal copies of all exposure and health monitoring records throughout their careers and into retirement, as silica-related diseases can develop or progress decades after exposure ceases. If changing employers, workers should request full copies of exposure and health records from previous employers to provide to new employers or medical practitioners conducting ongoing health surveillance. This continuity of records is essential for detecting disease progression and attributing disease to specific exposure periods. Workers diagnosed with silica-related disease will need these records to support workers' compensation claims and potential common law litigation, with detailed exposure history and health monitoring results being crucial evidence for establishing occupational causation and impairment assessment. Employers must retain health monitoring and exposure records for minimum 30 years after the worker ceases employment, but workers should not rely on employers maintaining records for these extended periods—maintaining personal copies is prudent. If employers refuse to provide exposure or health records upon request, workers can lodge complaints with WHS regulators who can direct employers to produce records, or seek assistance from unions or legal representatives. The provision of exposure and health information to workers demonstrates transparency and respect for workers' rights to information about hazards affecting their health, while refusal to provide records often indicates broader safety system deficiencies and should trigger regulatory scrutiny of the workplace.

Related SWMS documents

Browse all documents

plastering

Insulation - Ceiling Panel Installation Safe Work Method Statement

Comprehensive SWMS for installing ceiling insulation and panel systems including manual handling, confined space, and dust control procedures.

View document

plastering

Plasterboard Safe Work Method Statement

Detailed safety procedures for plasterboard installation covering sheet handling, working at heights, and power tool safety requirements.

View document

plastering

Rendering Safe Work Method Statement

Comprehensive SWMS for cement-based and acrylic rendering operations including scaffold work, silica dust control, chemical handling, and fall prevention protocols.

View document

plastering

Suspended Grid System Ceiling Installation Safe Work Method Statement

Comprehensive SWMS for installing suspended ceiling grid systems including scaffold work, overhead installation procedures, and coordination with building services.

View document
Trusted by 1,500+ Australian construction teams

Silica Dust SWMS Sample

Professional SWMS created in 5 seconds with OneClickSWMS

  • Instant PDF & shareable link
  • Auto-filled risk matrix
  • Editable Word download
  • State-specific compliance
  • Digital signature ready
  • Version history preserved
Manual creation2-3 hours
OneClickSWMS5 seconds
Save 99% of admin time and eliminate manual errors.
Generate SWMS NowView sample SWMS

No credit card required • Instant access • Unlimited drafts included in every plan

PDF Sample

Risk Rating

BeforeHigh
After ControlsLow

Key Controls

  • • Pre-start briefing covering hazards
  • • PPE: hard hats, eye protection, gloves
  • • Emergency plan communicated to crew

Signature Ready

Capture digital signatures onsite and store revisions with automatic timestamps.

Continue exploring

Hand-picked SWMS resources
RenderingExplore →PlasterboardExplore →

Ready to deliver professional SWMS in minutes?

OneClickSWMS powers thousands of compliant projects every week. Join them today.

Join 2,000+ Protected CompaniesExplore Safety Guides