What this SWMS covers
Graffiti removal represents specialised cleaning work addressing vandalism affecting buildings, infrastructure, transport assets, and public spaces across urban and regional Australia. The scope ranges from small-scale tag removal on shopfronts to extensive murals covering building facades, from spray paint on rendered masonry to permanent marker on glass, and from fresh graffiti removed within hours to aged markings requiring intensive treatment. Removal methods must match both the graffiti medium and substrate material, as inappropriate cleaning techniques can cause permanent surface damage exceeding the original vandalism impact. Chemical removal employing solvent-based paint strippers, alkaline cleaners, or specialised graffiti removers represents the most common approach dissolving paint, ink, or marker pigments allowing removal with minimal substrate damage. Mechanical methods including pressure washing, abrasive blasting, or grinding physically remove graffiti but risk surface damage if incorrectly applied. Sacrificial coating systems apply clear protective films over vulnerable surfaces allowing graffiti removal simply by replacing the damaged film layer. Chemical graffiti removers encompass diverse formulations selected based on graffiti type and surface material. Solvent-based removers containing methylene chloride, acetone, or aromatic hydrocarbons effectively dissolve spray paints and markers but present significant health hazards through inhalation, skin absorption, and fire risks. These aggressive solvents can also damage underlying surfaces including painted finishes, plastics, and some stone types requiring careful testing before widespread application. Water-based alkaline cleaners provide safer alternatives for some applications using caustic compounds to break down paint whilst generating less hazardous vapours, though skin contact still causes chemical burns. Bio-based removers employing plant-derived solvents offer lower toxicity profiles suitable for sensitive environments though often requiring extended application time and multiple treatments for complete removal. Specialised removers targeting specific graffiti types including permanent markers, etching creams, or stickers use formulations optimised for particular applications. Effective graffiti removal often requires testing multiple products identifying the most effective remover causing least substrate damage. Surface types significantly influence removal methodology and difficulty. Porous masonry including bricks, concrete blocks, and rendered surfaces absorb paint and solvents deep into the material making complete removal challenging without surface damage. Non-porous surfaces including glazed tiles, glass, metals, and sealed stone allow easier removal as graffiti sits on the surface rather than penetrating the substrate. Painted surfaces present particular challenges as removal solvents that dissolve graffiti often damage underlying paint requiring subsequent repainting. Heritage buildings and sensitive substrates including sandstone, terracotta, or decorative render require specialised gentle cleaning methods preventing irreversible damage to significant fabric. Plastic surfaces, signage, and modern composite materials may dissolve or discolour when contacted by aggressive solvents necessitating testing and potentially accepting incomplete removal rather than substrate destruction. Rough textured surfaces trap graffiti in surface irregularities requiring mechanical action combining chemical application with brushing or low-pressure washing. Work at heights requirements arise frequently in graffiti removal as vandals target visible locations including highway overpass abutments, building upper facades, and elevated signage. Access methods depend on location characteristics, work duration, and contractor capabilities. Mobile elevated work platforms provide safe access for low to medium height work on level ground with adequate clearance. Scaffolding offers stable work platforms for extended operations on building facades though installation and removal represent substantial cost and time investments. Rope access techniques employing abseiling equipment allow access to difficult locations including bridge piers and tall buildings by specially trained technicians. Ladders serve for quick access to lower heights though extended work from ladders creates significant fatigue and fall risks. Each access method brings specific hazards and control requirements under Australian high-risk work regulations. Environmental considerations during graffiti removal address chemical runoff, waste disposal, and protection of surrounding areas from contamination. Chemical removers and dissolved paint create hazardous liquid waste requiring proper containment preventing entry to stormwater systems and waterways. Ground surfaces beneath cleaning operations require protection using drop sheets, containment berms, or absorbent materials capturing spills and runoff. Pressure washing operations generate substantial water volumes potentially contaminated with paint, solvents, and substrate particles requiring collection and appropriate disposal. Vegetation near cleaning operations needs protection from overspray and chemical contact as many graffiti removers damage or kill plants. Air quality impacts from solvent vapours affect not only workers but also building occupants and neighbouring properties requiring ventilation planning and potentially notification of affected parties. Waste materials including contaminated rags, empty chemical containers, and collected wash water often classify as hazardous waste requiring disposal through licensed facilities rather than general waste streams. Operational timing affects both removal effectiveness and worker safety. Fresh graffiti removes more easily than aged markings as paint has not fully cured or weathered into surface irregularities. Rapid response programmes addressing graffiti within 24-48 hours of appearance achieve better removal outcomes with less chemical use and substrate damage. Temperature influences chemical remover effectiveness and safety with cold weather slowing chemical reactions reducing effectiveness whilst hot weather accelerates solvent evaporation increasing vapour exposure and fire risks. Humidity affects drying times and chemical behaviour with high humidity beneficial for some water-based removers but problematic for solvent-based products. Wind conditions disperse solvent vapours reducing worker exposure but potentially affecting nearby properties and complicating odour control. Public access requirements may necessitate after-hours work minimising disruption though creating additional hazards from reduced lighting and isolated work locations. Heritage sites, schools, and government buildings often impose access restrictions and approval processes affecting work scheduling and methodology.
Fully editable, audit-ready, and aligned to Australian WHS standards.
